The True Scam Rating Of David Deanglo And Ross Jeffries

Is David Deangelo a scam? Is Double Your Dating a scam?

Well, my first reaction is to say no, as he does bestow a fabulous service to men. He in fact gives us a lot of useful information on how to meet women.

However, from the view of providing a workable system his personal materials are certainly a marketing scam. "Cocky and Funny" his hallmark is not the most helpful and best data out there. His position as number one in terms of status has to be somewhat of a marketing scam since the workability of his materials do not simply justify it. Dating To Relating and Mr. L. Rx, the number two website by Alexa grading, offers a much more workable method.

David Deangelo's best materials with the most useful information and data is his dating guru series in which he interviews several different dating gurus. Notably, however, his greatest materials are materials that are not his assumptions.

Whether David is a marketing scam or not, still his materials are helpful and must be incorporated in your library if you are a true seeker of comprehending women. I Give him 6 on the scam-o-meter. (1=scam, 10=not.)

Is Speed Seduction A Swindle? Is Ross Jeffries A Scam?

Ross Jeffries was one of the creators of the dating tips community for men on the internet, but I believe he has become outdated and compared to writers such as Mr. L. Rx, David Deangelo, and Mystery his datums are less effectual in general . A few of his materials and techniques work, but a few are controversial, and some have the appearance of a complete sham.

I believe that the general problem with Ross's work is that it is simply helpful for only some select personalities of guys -- (guys who have low self esteem for example might appreciate his work) and for a few select personality types of women (like gamers and manipulating women). It is not going to work on all women. Thus to the degree he represents this is how you handle women, in general - his techniques are a scam.

In general there is some workability but not a lot. Not suitable for everyone.

So we will allocate him a 4 on the scam-o-meter.